home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: familynews.cycor.ca!usenet
- From: gcaine@cycor.ca (gcaine)
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.misc
- Subject: Re: 030 with no Fast RAM slower than a 020?
- Date: 28 Jan 1996 04:40:31 GMT
- Organization: Cycor Communications Inc., Coast to Coast Internet Services
- Message-ID: <235.6600T1284T2640@cycor.ca>
- References: <9601201902.AA000me@rekab.demon.co.uk> <744.6594T926T2709@canit.se>
- <297.6598T513T1946@cycor.ca> <4e8of1$npp@serpens.rhein.de>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: skt-as011.cycor.ca
- X-Newsreader: THOR 2.22 (Amiga;TCP/IP)
-
-
- >It's both. First you have a >= 560ns cycle for ChipRAM vs. something
- >like a <= 200ns cycle for FastRAM. Then you might be slowed down
- >further by custom chip activity.
-
- I learn something everday :)
-
- Gary Caine Member: Team AMIGA
-
-